skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Thread With Caution: Proactively Helping Users Assess and Deescalate Tension in Their Online Discussions

Published:11 November 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Incivility remains a major challenge for online discussion platforms, to such an extent that even conversations between well-intentioned users can often derail into uncivil behavior. Traditionally, platforms have relied on moderators to---with or without algorithmic assistance---take corrective actions such as removing comments or banning users. In this work we propose a complementary paradigm that directly empowers users by proactively enhancing their awareness about existing tension in the conversation they are engaging in and actively guides them as they are drafting their replies to avoid further escalation.

As a proof of concept for this paradigm, we design an algorithmic tool that provides such proactive information directly to users, and conduct a user study in a popular discussion platform. Through a mixed methods approach combining surveys with a randomized controlled experiment, we uncover qualitative and quantitative insights regarding how the participants utilize and react to this information. Most participants report finding this proactive paradigm valuable, noting that it helps them to identify tension that they may have otherwise missed and prompts them to further reflect on their own replies and to revise them. These effects are corroborated by a comparison of how the participants draft their reply when our tool warns them that their conversation is at risk of derailing into uncivil behavior versus in a control condition where the tool is disabled.These preliminary findings highlight the potential of this user-centered paradigm and point to concrete directions for future implementations.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

v6cscw2545.mp4

mp4

16.1 MB

References

  1. Ofer Arazy, Lisa Yeo, and Oded Nov. 2013. Stay on the Wikipedia Task : When Task-related Disagreements Slip Into Personal and Procedural Conflicts. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. , Vol. 64, 8 (Aug. 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zahra Ashktorab and Jessica Vitak. 2016. Designing Cyberbullying Mitigation and Prevention Solutions through Participatory Design With Teenagers. In Proceedings of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jiajun Bao, Junjie Wu, Yiming Zhang, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, and David Jurgens. 2021. Conversations Gone Alright : Quantifying and Predicting Prosocial Outcomes in Online Conversations. In Proceedings of WWW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Matt Billings and Leon A. Watts. 2010. Understanding Dispute Resolution Online: Using Text to Reflect Personal and Substantive Issues in Conflict. In Proceedings of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Paolo Bory. 2019. Deep New: The Shifting Narratives of Artificial Intelligence from Deep Blue to AlphaGo. Convergence, Vol. 25, 4 (Aug. 2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Johanna Brewer, Morgan Romine, and T. L. Taylor. 2020. Inclusion at Scale : Deploying a Community-Driven Moderation Intervention on Twitch. In Proceedings of DIS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Barry Brown, Stuart Reeves, and Scott Sherwood. 2011. Into the Wild: Challenges and Opportunities for Field Trial Methods. In Proceedings of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Penelope Brown and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jie Cai and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2019. What Are Effective Strategies of Handling Harassment on Twitch ? Users ' Perspectives. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jie Cai, Donghee Yvette Wohn, and Mashael Almoqbel. 2021. Moderation Visibility : Mapping the Strategies of Volunteer Moderators in Live Streaming Micro Communities. In Proceedings of IMX.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Anirudh Srinivasan, Adam Glynn, Jacob Eisenstein, and Eric Gilbert. 2017. You Can 't Stay Here : The Efficacy of Reddit 's 2015 Ban Examined Through Hate Speech. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Mattia Samory, Shagun Jhaver, Hunter Charvat, Amy Bruckman, Cliff Lampe, Jacob Eisenstein, and Eric Gilbert. 2018. The Internet 's Hidden Rules : An Empirical Study of Reddit Norm Violations at Micro, Meso, and Macro Scales. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jonathan P Chang, Justin Cheng, and Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil. 2020. Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood :Comparing Intentions and Perceptions in Online Discussions. In Proceedings of WWW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jonathan P. Chang and Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil. 2019. Trouble on the Horizon : Forecasting the Derailment of Online Conversations as They Develop. In Proceedings of EMNLP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Justin Cheng, Michael Bernstein, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Anyone Can Become a Troll : Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Emily I. M. Collins, Anna L. Cox, Jon Bird, and Daniel Harrison. 2014. Social Networking Use and RescueTime : The Issue of Engagement. In Proceedings of UbiComp Adjunct.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sunny Consolvo, David W. McDonald, Tammy Toscos, Mike Y. Chen, Jon Froehlich, Beverly Harrison, Predrag Klasnja, Anthony LaMarca, Louis LeGrand, Ryan Libby, Ian Smith, and James A. Landay. 2008. Activity Sensing in the Wild: A Field Trial of Ubifit Garden. In Proceedings of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kate Crawford and Tarleton Gillespie. 2016. What Is a Flag for? Social Media Reporting Tools and the Vocabulary of Complaint. New Media & Society, Vol. 18, 3 (March 2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Moritz Sudhof, Dan Jurafsky, Jure Leskovec, and Christopher Potts. 2013. A Computational Approach to Politeness with Application to Social Factors. In Proceedings of ACL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomas Davidson, Dana Warmsley, Michael Macy, and Ingmar Weber. 2017. Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language. In Proceedings of ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Julian Dibbell. 2005. A Rape in Cyberspace. The Village Voice (Oct. 2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Bryan Dosono and Bryan Semaan. 2019. Moderation Practices as Emotional Labor in Sustaining Online Communities : The Case of AAPI Identity Work on Reddit. In Proceedings of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Natasha Duarte and Emma Llansó. 2018. Mixed Messages ? The Limits of Automated Social Media Content Analysis. In Proceedings of FAccT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. R. Stuart Geiger. 2016. Bot-Based Collective Blocklists in Twitter : The Counterpublic Moderation of Harassment in a Networked Public Space. Information, Communication & Society , Vol. 19, 6 (June 2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. R. Stuart Geiger and David Ribes. 2010. The Work of Sustaining Order in Wikipedia: The Banning of a Vandal. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Alex Georgakopoulou, Stefan Iversen, and Carsten Stage. 2020. Making Memes Count : Platformed Rallying on Reddit. In Quantified Storytelling : A Narrative Analysis of Metrics on Social Media, , Alex Georgakopoulou, Stefan Iversen, and Carsten Stage (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sarah A. Gilbert. 2020. "I Run the World's Largest Historical Outreach Project and It's on a Cesspool of a Website." Moderating a Public Scholarship Site on Reddit : A Case Study of r/AskHistorians. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tarleton Gillespie. 2018. Custodians of the Internet : Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Tarleton Gillespie. 2020. Content Moderation, AI, and the Question of Scale:. Big Data & Society (July 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tarleton Gillespie, Patricia Aufderheide, Elinor Carmi, Ysabel Gerrard, Robert Gorwa, Ariadna Matamoros-Fernández, Sarah T. Roberts, Aram Sinnreich, and Sarah Myers West. 2020. Expanding the Debate about Content Moderation: Scholarly Research Agendas for the Coming Policy Debates. Internet Policy Review, Vol. 9, 4 (Oct. 2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Joseph K. Goodman, Cynthia E. Cryder, and Amar Cheema. 2013. Data Collection in a Flat World : The Strengths and Weaknesses of Mechanical Turk Samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , Vol. 26, 3 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Robert Gorwa, Reuben Binns, and Christian Katzenbach. 2020. Algorithmic Content Moderation: Technical and Political Challenges in the Automation of Platform Governance. Big Data & Society, Vol. 7, 1 (Jan. 2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. James Grimmelmann. 2015. The Virtues of Moderation. Yale Journal of Law and Technology , Vol. 17, 1 (Sept. 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ivan Habernal, Henning Wachsmuth, Iryna Gurevych, and Benno Stein. 2018. Before Name-Calling : Dynamics and Triggers of Ad Hominem Fallacies in Web Argumentation. In Proceedings of NAACL.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Aaron Halfaker, Bryan Song, D. Alex Stuart, Aniket Kittur, and John Riedl. 2011. NICE : Social Translucence Through UI Intervention. In Proceedings of WikiSym.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Francis Heylighen and Jean-Marc Dewaele. 1999. Formality of Language : Definition, Measurement and Behavioral Determinants. Technical Report. Center "Leo Apostel", Free University of Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Christopher Hidey, Elena Musi, Alyssa Hwang, Smaranda Muresan, and Kathy McKeown. 2017. Analyzing the Semantic Types of Claims and Premises in an Online Persuasive Forum. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Eric Holgate, Isabel Cachola, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, and Junyi Jessy Li. 2018. Why Swear ? Analyzing and Inferring the Intentions of Vulgar Expressions. In Proceeding of EMNLP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Karen Huang, Michael Yeomans, Alison Wood Brooks, Julia Minson, and Francesca Gino. 2017. It Doesn't Hurt to Ask: Question-asking Increases Liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 113, 3 (Sept. 2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Krithika Jagannath, Katie Salen, and Petr Slovàk. 2020. "(We ) Can Talk It Out. ..": Designing for Promoting Conflict-Resolution Skills in Youth on a Moderated Minecraft Server. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Shagun Jhaver, Darren Scott Appling, Eric Gilbert, and Amy Bruckman. 2019a. “Did You Suspect the Post Would Be Removed ?”: Understanding User Reactions to Content Removals on Reddit. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Shagun Jhaver, Iris Birman, Eric Gilbert, and Amy Bruckman. 2019b. Human-Machine Collaboration for Content Regulation : The Case of Reddit Automoderator. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 26, 5 (July 2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Shagun Jhaver, Larry Chan, and Amy Bruckman. 2018a. The View from the Other Side: The Border between Controversial Speech and Harassment on Kotaku in Action. First Monday, Vol. 23, 2 (Feb. 2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Shagun Jhaver, Sucheta Ghoshal, Amy Bruckman, and Eric Gilbert. 2018b. Online Harassment and Content Moderation : The Case of Blocklists. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 25, 2 (March 2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Shagun Jhaver, Pranil Vora, and Amy Bruckman. 2017. Designing for Civil Conversations : Lessons Learned from ChangeMyView. Technical Report. Georgia Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Christian Katzenbach. 2021. “AI Will Fix This” textendash The Technical, Discursive, and Political Turn to AI in Governing Communication. Big Data & Society, Vol. 8, 2 (July 2021).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Sara Kiesler, Robert Kraut, Paul Resnick, and Aniket Kittur. 2012. Regulating Behavior in Online Communities. In Building Successful Online Communities : Evidence-Based Social Design, , Paul Resnick and Robert Kraut (Eds.). MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Aniket Kittur and Robert E. Kraut. 2008. Harnessing the Wisdom of Crowds in Wikipedia : Quality Through Coordination. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Geza Kovacs, Zhengxuan Wu, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2018. Rotating Online Behavior Change Interventions Increases Effectiveness But Also Increases Attrition. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Paul Krebs, James O. Prochaska, and Joseph S. Rossi. 2010. A Meta-Analysis of Computer-Tailored Interventions for Health Behavior Change. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 51, 3 (Sept. 2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Travis Kriplean, Jonathan Morgan, Deen Freelon, Alan Borning, and Lance Bennett. 2012a. Supporting Reflective Public Thought with Considerit. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Travis Kriplean, Michael Toomim, Jonathan Morgan, Alan Borning, and Andrew Ko. 2012b. Is This What You Meant?: Promoting Listening on the Web with Reflect. In Proceedings of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Srijan Kumar, Justin Cheng, Jure Leskovec, and V.S. Subrahmanian. 2017. An Army of Me : Sockpuppets in Online Discussion Communities. In Proceedings of WWW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Srijan Kumar, William L. Hamilton, Jure Leskovec, and Dan Jurafsky. 2018. Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web. In Proceedings of WWW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Robin T. Lakoff. 1973. The Logic of Politeness : Minding Your P 's and Q 's. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Cliff Lampe and Paul Resnick. 2004. Slash(Dot) and Burn: Distributed Moderation in a Large Online Conversation Space. In Proceedings of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Ping Liu, Joshua Guberman, Libby Hemphill, and Aron Culotta. 2018. Forecasting the Presence and Intensity of Hostility on Instagram Using Linguistic and Social Features. In Proceedings of ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Claudia (Claudia Wai Yu) Lo. 2018. When All You Have Is a Banhammer : The Social and Communicative Work of Volunteer Moderators. Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Lena Mamykina, Bella Manoim, Manas Mittal, George Hripcsak, and Björn Hartmann. 2011. Design Lessons from the Fastest Q &A Site in the West. In Proceedings of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Aske Mottelson and Kasper Hornbæk. 2017. Virtual Reality Studies Outside the Laboratory. In Proceedings of VRST.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Daniel J. O'Keefe. 1997. Standpoint Explicitness and Persuasive Effect : A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Varying Conclusion Articulation in Persuasive Messages. Argumentation and Advocacy , Vol. 34, 1 (June 1997).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Daniel J. O'Keefe. 1998. Justification Explicitness and Persuasive Effect : A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Varying Support Articulation in Persuasive Messages. Argumentation and Advocacy , Vol. 35, 2 (Sept. 1998).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. James W. Pennebaker, Cindy K. Chung, Joey Frazee, Gary M. Lavergne, and David I. Beaver. 2014. When Small Words Foretell Academic Success : The Case of College Admissions Essays. PLOS ONE (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Katharina Reinecke and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2015. LabintheWild : Conducting Large-Scale Online Experiments With Uncompensated Samples. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Annika Richterich. 2014. `Karma, Precious Karma !' Karmawhoring on Reddit and the Front Page 's Econometrisation. Journal of Peer Production , Vol. 4, 1 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Sarah T Roberts. 2014. Behind the Screen: The Hidden Digital Labor of Commercial Content Moderation. Ph.,D. Dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Joseph Seering. 2020. Reconsidering Self-Moderation : The Role of Research in Supporting Community-Based Models for Online Content Moderation. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Joseph Seering, Tianmi Fang, Luca Damasco, Mianhong 'Cherie' Chen, Likang Sun, and Geoff Kaufman. 2019a. Designing User Interface Elements to Improve the Quality and Civility of Discourse in Online Commenting Behaviors. In Proceedings of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Joseph Seering, Geoff Kaufman, and Stevie Chancellor. 2020. Metaphors in Moderation. New Media & Society (Oct. 2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Joseph Seering, Robert Kraut, and Laura Dabbish. 2017. Shaping Pro and Anti-Social Behavior on Twitch Through Moderation and Example-Setting. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Joseph Seering, Tony Wang, Jina Yoon, and Geoff Kaufman. 2019b. Moderator Engagement and Community Development in the Age of Algorithms. New Media & Society, Vol. 21, 7 (July 2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Kumar Srinivasan, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Lillian Lee, and Chenhao Tan. 2019. Content Removal as a Moderation Strategy : Compliance and Other Outcomes in the ChangeMyView Community. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Chenhao Tan, Vlad Niculae, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu, and Lillian Lee. 2016. Winning Arguments : Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussions. In Proceedings of WWW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Samuel Hardman Taylor, Dominic DiFranzo, Yoon Hyung Choi, Shruti Sannon, and Natalya N. Bazarova. 2019. Accountability and Empathy by Design : Encouraging Bystander Intervention to Cyberbullying on Social Media. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Kal Turnbull. 2018. “That 's Bullshit ” textendash Rude Enough for Removal ? A Multi-Mod Perspective.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhongyu Wei, Yang Liu, and Yi Li. 2016. Is This Post Persuasive ? Ranking Argumentative Comments in the Online Forum. In Proceedings of ACL.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Galen Weld, Amy X. Zhang, and Tim Althoff. 2022. What Makes Online Communities 'Better '? Measuring Values, Consensus, and Conflict across Thousands of Subreddits. In Proceedings of ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2019. Volunteer Moderators in Twitch Micro Communities : How They Get Involved, the Roles They Play, and the Emotional Labor They Experience. In Proceedings of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Austin P. Wright, Omar Shaikh, Haekyu Park, Will Epperson, Muhammed Ahmed, Stephane Pinel, Diyi Yang, and Duen Horng Chau. 2021. RECAST : Interactive Auditing of Automatic Toxicity Detection Models. In Proceedings of CSCW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Ellery Wulczyn, Nithum Thain, and Lucas Dixon. 2017. Ex Machina : Personal Attacks Seen at Scale. In Proceedings of WWW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Justine Zhang, Jonathan P. Chang, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Lucas Dixon, Nithum Thain, Yiqing Hua, and Dario Taraborelli. 2018. Conversations Gone Awry : Detecting Early Signs of Conversational Failure. In Proceedings of ACL.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Justine Zhang, Arthur Spirling, and Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil. 2017. Asking Too Much ? The Rhetorical Role of Questions in Political Discourse. In Proceedings of EMNLP. ioGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Thread With Caution: Proactively Helping Users Assess and Deescalate Tension in Their Online Discussions

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
          Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW2
          CSCW
          November 2022
          8205 pages
          EISSN:2573-0142
          DOI:10.1145/3571154
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 November 2022
          Published in pacmhci Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader