Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Why everyone’s mad at Apple’s new iPad ad

A college professor wants to use Section 230 against Big Tech

Commerce Department revokes more export licenses to China’s Huawei

In Arizona, election workers trained with deepfakes to prepare for 2024

Biden back in the battleground state of Wisconsin

How Trump’s allies amplify his Truth Social messages to the wider world

Dog hit by car loses leg, is adopted by firefighter who helped her

Postal worker finds WWII-era letters, drives 5 hours to deliver them

Strangers help Sesame Street puppeteer after heirloom necklace was stolen

Nationals finally run out of answers and fall to Orioles in 12 innings

These Nationals are pretty fun. They would be more fun with James Wood.

Nats go over .500 the hard way by beating the O’s and Corbin Burnes

In the campaign against Donald Trump, do the ends justify the means?

The next global crisis could come from the sun. We should prepare now.

The FTC’s noncompete clause rule goes too far

Ask Amy: Relatives keep me giving me updates on my old family home

Carolyn Hax: Was it wrong to approach late wife’s pal for no-commitment sex?

Miss Manners: My roommate and I have opposite sleep schedules

What Trump promised oil CEOs as he asked them to steer $1 billion to his campaign

Judge keeps tying Trump to possible intimidation

In court, Stormy Daniels pulled a Trump on Trump 

RFK Jr’s ‘history lesson’ on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine flunks the fact test

The Trump-Biden battle over the 2017 tax cut

That time football legend, rig-driving eligible bachelor Biden was arrested

Think you want a dog? Take our quiz to find out if you’re ready.

‘Look at the U.S.A.’: A photographer’s reflection on post-9/11 conflict

Cruise worker charged with stabbing 3 with scissors on ship off Canada

France tries to shed its rude reputation ahead of the Olympics

Don’t be a jerk at the airport: A guide for headphones

How Brittney Griner raised and keeps raising the profile of hostages held abroad

Middle East conflict live updates: Israeli officials criticize Biden’s threat to halt weapons over Rafah

Israel puts Rafah in the eye of the storm

Biden

Big Tech news and how to take control of your data and devices

See more coverage in your recommendations

Technology

Tips delivered to your inbox twice weekly

The Tech Friend newsletter

Business and Tech alerts

Get the weekly Campaign Moment newsletter

Set alerts for major election developments

Election 2024

The Campaign Moment newsletter

Politics alerts

Dado Ruvic

LOS ANGELES — On Thursday, Twitter announced that it would begin sharing ad revenue with content creators on its platform for the first time. But the offer won’t apply to all creators.

The first beneficiaries appear to be high-profile far-right influencers who tweeted before the announcement how much they’ve earned as part of the program. Ian Miles Cheong, Benny Johnson and Ashley St. Clair all touted their earnings.

“Wow. Elon Musk wasn’t kidding. Content monetization is real,” tweeted an anonymous account called End Wokeness, with 1.4 million followers, accompanied by a screenshot showing earnings of over $10,400.

So far, many of the influencers who have publicly revealed that they’re part of the program are prominent figures on the right. Andrew Tate, for example, who was <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/03/world/europe/andrew-tate-house-arrest-romania.html" target=_blank>recently released from jail on rape and human trafficking charges</a>, posted that he’d been paid over $20,000 by Twitter.

“This is a nice turnaround from being banned by Twitter 1.0 for almost 2 years to now being paid to post Thank you @elonmusk,” tweeted far-right influencer Rogan O’Handley, known as DC Draino.

But not all prominent right-wing Twitter contributors appeared to be part of the program. When asked if she was part of the program, Chaya Raichik, the creator of @libsoftiktok, offered a tongue-in-cheek response claiming that her relationship with Musk was thriving. She did not respond to a question about whether she was receiving payments under the program.

Anti-Trump influencers Ed Krassenstein and Brian Krassenstein, who were <a href="https://variety.com/2019/digital/news/twitter-bans-ed-brian-krassenstein-brothers-fake-accounts-1203225266/" target=_blank>previously banned from Twitter in 2019</a>, also announced that they were part of the program.

Musk did not respond to a request for comment emailed to him at Twitter and at SpaceX, another company he owns.

“I think that there are some conservative content creators who are unhappy,” said Kris Ruby, a conservative influencer and president of Ruby Media Group. “It doesn’t seem even across the board. I don’t think the playing field is level.”

She said some on the right who weren’t included in the program, despite meeting all the criteria, are venting in private. “Most conservatives don’t want to go up against the wrath of Elon and what happens when you criticize him,” she said. “We’ve seen that he’s not really applying the terms of service equally across the board.”

Twitter claimed <a href="https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/creator-ads-revenue-sharing" target="_blank">in a blog post</a> that creators’ share of advertising revenue would be based on a calculation of replies to their posts and monthly impressions. However, on Friday, Musk tweeted that payouts were not tied to public impressions but were calculated using <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1679717154973945856" target="_blank">a proprietary metric</a> based on ads served to other verified users.

The program is available only in countries where Stripe, a payment platform, supports payouts, and recipients must pay for Twitter Blue, the platform’s monthly subscription service, to be eligible.

Not all creators who want to monetize will be able to. Creators who apply to the program will have to pass “human review,” and there is currently no open application for those interested in joining.

Some nonpolitical contributors expressed frustration with the lack of transparency from the company over the rollout of the program.

“My tweets have generated 100s of millions of impressions for Twitter every year,” Matt Navarra, a social media strategist who runs the tech-focused newsletter and community <a href="https://geekout.mattnavarra.com/" target=_blank>Geekout</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/mattnavarra/status/1679553342148685824" target=_blank>posted on Thursday</a>. “And I’ve been on the platform for 15+ years. It’s pretty lame there is no payout coming my way. Twitter has never generated any income directly for all the content I have put in to it.”

Former Twitter staffers who worked on creator-focused products expressed skepticism over the rollout, with several calling it a PR stunt. One former Twitter executive who worked on creator partnerships and who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid retaliation, said that “any kind of content monetization we’ve done in the past was based on a revenue model. This just feels pulled out of thin air for a specific subset of creators that he wanted to placate.”

The former Twitter executive also cast doubt on Twitter’s revamped metrics, including impressions. “The numbers are totally and completely bogus. It’s all completely made up. It really feels like they’re arbitrarily writing checks to people they like, which is not a sustainable creator strategy.”

Latasha James, a full-time YouTube creator in Detroit, said Twitter is too volatile for content creators to invest much time in. “As a creator, I seek out monetization opportunities with brands and platforms that seem well-funded and stable,” she said. “Twitter has been the opposite of stable for the past year, so I’d definitely be wary of relying on their monetization program to make a living.”

Others agreed that even if Musk were to offer every creator a payout, the site’s rightward turn would keep them from posting.

“He’s censoring speech that he doesn’t like and amplifying speech that he does, and he’s picking the people that he wants to have a voice on the platform and silencing others,” said Rathbone DeBuys, a musician and content creator in New Orleans, who monetizes on TikTok. “It seems like there’s no rhyme or reason to it. He’s decided arbitrarily that these are the people who are going to make money off the platform because these are [his] friends.”

“I try to respect my values in my business, and I feel like the things Elon has been doing are not aligned with my values,” said Lu Levy, a YouTube content creator and digital business coach for content creators. “ … I already get such good monetization on other platforms, especially YouTube, it’s just not worth going against what I believe in.”

The timing of Musk’s announcement comes on the heels of Twitter rival Instagram announcing that its Twitter-like app Threads had surpassed 100 million sign-ups in under a week, making it the fastest-growing app of all time. Jordan Lintz, owner of HighKey Enterprises, a public relations firm, said he thinks Threads should take a cue from Twitter’s new monetization offerings. “Threads user retention is going to slip eventually,” Lintz said. “I think whoever provides the best monetization will win the retention race. It’s something Threads might have to look into.”

Jules Terpak, a content creator and digital culture expert, said that as someone who tweets a lot, she finds the prospect of earning money from posts appealing, but she’s watching to see how Musk will handle thorny issues like content theft and bots. She’s also wondering if this new monetization plan is sustainable, given Twitter’s struggle to retain advertising revenue.

“As soon as I’m seeing these amounts, my first question is, how is this going to be sustained?” she said. “The track record so far with Elon’s ownership is that a lot of things that sound very pretty, then you see them in action and there’s these more negative nuances to it.”

A previous version of this article misspelled the last name of Ashley St. Clair. The article has been corrected. In addition, after this story was published, The Post became aware that influencers Ed Krassenstein and Brian Krassenstein had announced they were part of the program. The article has been updated.

Taylor Lorenz is a columnist at The Washington Post covering technology and online culture. Before joining The Post, she was a technology reporter for the New York Times. Previously, she was a technology reporter at the Atlantic and the Daily Beast. 

Taylor Lorenz

washpost

Twitter begins paying Andrew Tate, DC Draino for their contributions

the-washington-post

FILE PHOTO: Illustration shows Elon Musk photo and Twitter logo

DADO RUVIC

Reuters

Help Desk

Artificial Intelligence

Internet Culture

Space

Tech Policy

Balance of Power Pair

U.S. House Aggregate

U.S. Senate Aggregate

Tech

prism://prism.query/site,/technology/internet-culture&limit=20

prism://prism.query/two-sites,/technology,/politics/powerpost/the-technology-202?limit=20

prism://prism.query/site-articles-only,/politics&limit=20

Cut through the 2024 election noise. Get The Campaign Moment newsletter.

Politics

Post Politics from The Washington Post is the source for political news headlines, in-depth politics coverage and political opinion, plus breaking news on the biden administration and White House, Congress, the Supreme Court, elections and more.