Thursday, June 8th 2023

Seagate HAMR 32 TB Capacity Drives Arriving Later This Year, 40+ TB in 2024

Seagate has recently published a preview of its next generation product hard drive lineup that utilize heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) technology. A company roadmap indicates that the first commercial release of 32 TB capacity HAMR Mach 2 drives is penciled in for a Q3 2023 window, with a short hop to increased storage (40 TB) models predicted for launch in 2024. Seagate is also expected to release 24 TB and 28 TB capacity HDDs - based on the older perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) technology - at some point in the near future. Technology news outlets anticipate that these two product ranges will co-exist for a while, until Seagate decides to favor its more advanced thermal magnetic storage solution. A lucky data center client has been getting hands-on time with evaluation HAMR hardware, as reported in late April. Seagate has since supplied other enterprise customers with unspecified HAMR HDD models.

Executives at Seagate have been openly discussing their HAMR products - destined to sit in new Corvault server equipment. Gianluca Romano, the company's chief financial officer, mentioned several models during a presentation at the Bank of America 2023 Global Technology conference: "When you go to HAMR, our 32-terabyte (model) is based on 10 disks and 20 heads. So same number of disks and head of the current 20-terabyte PMR...So all the increase is coming through areal density. The following one, 40-terabyte, still (has) the same 10 disks and 20 heads. And also the 50 (TB model), we said at our earnings release, in our lab, we are already running individual disk at 5 terabytes."
He continues to outline the cost benefit of producing these hard disk drives: "So we can increase capacity by a lot without increasing the cost per unit because it's the same bill of material. So that will give the industry and Seagate in particular, because we are not the first adopter, to have a cost reduction and to maybe give some of that cost reduction to our customers, not to improve their TCO, we want them to be successful, but not all. In the past, the vast majority of the cost was passed to customers. I think HAMR will give us opportunity to still provide a good total cost of ownership (TCO) to the customer, but keep a good part of that cost improvement into Seagate and therefore, improve the gross margin. That is the main focus, the main strategy of the company and why we spend so much money in developing HAMR."

Romano proposes that Seagate will ultimately profit from their new endeavor, alongside a small saving for clients: "That is another good advantage of HAMR. If you think 40-terabyte based on 10 disks and 20 heads, there are probably only one segment that will use 40 terabytes at their point. So it's only the cloud. The other segments of enterprise OEM probably will be in the 30 terabytes, video and image application will be in the 20 terabytes and other legacy products will be lower. But you can see, for example, in the video and image application, they could have a 20-terabyte with 5 disks and 10 heads. So this drive will basically compete with a traditional drive with 10 disks and 20 heads. So it's a huge difference in bill of material, a huge difference in cost. Again, it's not that we need to give all that cost to customers. We give a little bit of that cost benefit to customers. And the rest of the benefit should stay with Seagate and, again, improving our gross margin at very different capacity points using the new technology."
Sources: AnandTech, Tom's Guide, Seeking Alpha
Add your own comment

12 Comments on Seagate HAMR 32 TB Capacity Drives Arriving Later This Year, 40+ TB in 2024

#1
Chaitanya
Hopefully these will push down prices of smaller drives quite a bit.
Posted on Reply
#2
Denver
Fix the title, TB not GB.
Posted on Reply
#3
chrcoluk
I expect this tech to probably only be used on the higher capacity drives, seems to be aimed at enteprise and maybe NAS.
Posted on Reply
#4
kondamin
ChaitanyaHopefully these will push down prices of smaller drives quite a bit.
That would be nice $100 for a 16TB drive
Posted on Reply
#5
Dragokar
kondaminThat would be nice $100 for a 16TB drive
Oh yeah that would be lovely. I need plain storage, does not have to be the fastest though, thats why I still use hard drives in my NAS and other backups.
Posted on Reply
#6
kondamin
DragokarOh yeah that would be lovely. I need plain storage, does not have to be the fastest though, thats why I still use hard drives in my NAS and other backups.
yes, for photos I don’t need insane speeds and io, it just costs a small fortune to populate a nas redundantly.
i dread the thought of being in to video and having to provide for that
Posted on Reply
#7
RegaeRevaeb
It's telling the CFO stated they could "maybe" pass on cost savings to buyers. Hopefully that happens, especially all the way down retail channels.
Posted on Reply
#8
Octavean
So if the drive is hot,....you know its working right :)

I'm all for larger capacity HDD's until such time as SSD prices and capacity reach something more akin to parity. I don't see HDD prices taking a significant reduction though. An 8TB or 16TB HDD is still fine for my NAS needs. I'd rather buy two new 16 TB drives then a single 32TB drive if it will save me money. If a 16TB HDD (CMR) cost about ~$230 USD and a 32TB drive cost about ~$460 then fine I'm all over it but that isn't likely going to be the pricing scheme. That ~$460 is closer to what 22TB drives cost now,.... they are almost certainly going to go higher in price for the 40TB and the 50TB when it hits the market.
Posted on Reply
#9
R-T-B
I have one of the first HAMR-driven WD UltraStars in my server. It's an 18TB model. Been a good performer.
Posted on Reply
#11
Chaitanya
kondaminThat would be nice $100 for a 16TB drive
$100 for 16TB would be a pipedream but even if these HAMR drives push 8TB drives for under $100 would be great for storing photos and videos on NAS at reasonable prices.
Posted on Reply
#12
The Von Matrices
kondaminThat would be nice $100 for a 16TB drive
I don't think we'll ever see prices that low for new drives due to cost of manufacturing.

Times have changed. It's not like the past where platter density would increase and then a new revision of the drive would come out with fewer platters and fewer parts for a lower price. Now the platter density stays the same and larger drives just add more platters (and cost).
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 2nd, 2024 05:20 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts